If your thought is true, then isn't that a justifiable cost tradeoff? My initial thought was that there was some speed issue accessing the chip and the macro was written based on a guess that happened to work. Unless you prove what the issue is, then you can't tell whether the address bits are important or it just randomly works if you insert nops based on that heuristic. On 11/03/2022 18:06, Francesco Messineo wrote: > However, they should have corrected the hardware, not make this > software workaround. >Received on 2022-03-12 11:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.