4 de septiembre de 2022 6:47, ruud_at_baltissen.org escribió: >> The fact that the 65xx CPUs are limited in things like: >> - How many registers they have and their purposes >> - How much memory they can address >> - How many different opcodes can be implemented and what can they do > > IMO it is if you are complaining that a T-Ford is a..... T-Ford. Not complaining, but cars today works under the same principles as the T-Ford, but more efficient and powerful. Why not to apply that way of thinking to the 65xx architecture? > >> ,,,, it would translate to VHDL code .... > > There are already many free excellent VHDL codes at hand. What's the problem in expanding one with > your wishes? But... That could be a solution. > >> via a compiler A compiler that would read the 65xx code and then detect if additional modules are needed to be included in the VHDL target. Like... IF "LDB instruction detected" THEN "add another register module to the VHDL target and name it B". > > I didn't know what you meant but the later posters talked about Java. You want to use Java, C or > whatever to create a simulator and then compile the reult into VHDL? It has been a long time ago I > worked with VHDL but IMHO it is a neat language. IMHO it almost looks like Pascal. And if you want > to use simulators, there are many VHDL simulators available, just Google. > > Just my two cents... > > -- > Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Ruud Baltissen > > www.Baltissen.orgReceived on 2022-09-04 14:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.