On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:21:01 +0100 Ruud@Baltissen.org wrote: > Hallo Vanessa, > > > > It defeats the purpose of a free and open Internet. > > Which also means that one is free to put text on his image :) > > > Instead, add a hidden watermark > > What does diminishing or enlarging do with this hidden watermark? Depends on how it is implemented. Last such example I saw could survive resizing and minor modifications to the image, though I don't remember what the limits were. I believe it simply reduced the watermark image to only 3 or 4 bits per pixel and use the result to replace the lowest-order bits of the original image. Crude, but effective. > And what if people use this picture anyway, are you going to sue > (??? accuse, summon) them? If it were me, no. Not worth the time and effort unless the offender is using my images to make a ton of money or something. In the case of the original poster, it's up to him. :-) -- "There are some things in life worth obsessing over. Most things aren't, and when you learn that, life improves." http://digitalaudioconcepts.com Vanessa Ezekowitz <vanessaezekowitz@gmail.com> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2011-12-04 01:00:08
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.