On 2012-12-10, at 08:06, Wolfgang Moser wrote: > do you both remember that once we had a discussion on this topic. One > possible goal of three discussed solution was to manage 64-bit > compatibility of "CBM_FILE" internally to OpenCBM, so that "CBM_FILE" is > always a 32-bit integer, even under 64-bit systems. > > This would manage binary compatibility to older 0.4.x OpenCBM releases. > This VICE incompatbility is probably just one example of this issue. > > Oh, and sorry for pointing this out while having failed to give an > implementation for that internal mapping so far ;-) This might of course be helpful but IMHO it would also unnecessarily hide the problem in VICE, which was only accidentally discovered thanks to you failing to implement this ;-) -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-12-16 21:00:09
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.