Nate Dannenberg wrote:
> If a SCPU is NOT present, the card should be able to replace it, and run
> programs designed for the SCPU without modifications. After all, it's
> probably easier to add a video driver to a program than it is to rewritre
> the program to run under a different environment.
Isn't this getting silly? Now we're suggesting that Jeri's board
is not just a video board, but also a near-perfect SuperCPU
replacement/emulator?
And if it did do the SCPU thing, why would we bother keeping our SCPUs?
--
Robin Harbron macbeth@psw.nu
http://www.tbaytel.net/macbeth
http://www.psw.nu/
-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.