Marko Mäkelä wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Nicolas Welte wrote:
>
> > I might have a PET2001 with BASIC 1.0, but I'm not sure. I remember there was
> > an easy check with the startup message, which either started with ### or ***.
> > Which is which? I could also check the ROM chips, of course.
>
> According to VICE, BASIC 2.0 is ###, and BASIC 1.0 is ***. To add some
> confusion, also BASIC 4.0 is ***, but the message includes the version
> number.
So I probably have BASIC 2.0 installed. But I'll check it again, and I also
have a dead 2001 board, which might have the BASIC 1.0 ROMs. For this machine
your device should be especially useful, because the disk routines are said
to be broken.
Nicolas
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.