Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)
From: Cameron Kaiser (spectre_at_stockholm.ptloma.edu)
Date: 2001-12-11 00:02:12
- Previous message: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- In reply to: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Next in thread: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Next in thread: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Reply: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
> > According to VICE, BASIC 2.0 is ###, and BASIC 1.0 is ***. To add some
> > confusion, also BASIC 4.0 is ***, but the message includes the version
> > number.
>
> Both of my working 2001 start with ***, so they have BASIC 1.0.
How interesting; my 2001-16B has ### (thus 2.0).
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser@stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- Anything that can be put into a nutshell belongs there. -- F. G. Brauer ----
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
- Previous message: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- In reply to: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Next in thread: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Next in thread: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Reply: Nicolas Welte: "Re: PET II questions (P500, B128, B256)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.