From: Cameron Kaiser (spectre_at_floodgap.com)
Date: 2003-08-26 04:19:45
> I see them all the same way: both. (multipart/alternative;
> most reasonable mail readers will pick the best one they candle. For
> example, I use mutt, a text-based reader, so it shows me the text
> version; most people with HTML-capable readers will see the HTML
> part.)
>
> Since you're giving them both, I think you're fine, and those who
> complain should upgrade to a modern email client (which could be a
> text-based one like mutt...)
Elm ME+ also understands multipart/alternative, although I still think
plain text is just friendlier in general.
--
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser@floodgap.com
-- The superfluous is very necessary. -- Voltaire -----------------------------
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.