>>> Yeah... I can't imagine how on Mother Earth _ignoring_ a fully >>> established functional header can be done by default and called >>> improvement. >> >> I can, and now I want this is my client. Reply-to munging on mailing >> lists is considered harmful. Ignoring the Reply-To header if the mail >> also has a list header sounds like the way of least harm. > > What do you mean 'least harm'? I prefer that a mailing list behaves like > a normal email. Meaning when I reply to it, the reply goes to where it > came from, the sender of the mail, or if from a mailing list, the > mailing list. > > Very rarely I need a direct reply circumventing the list. This link seems to make a good point: https://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I can see in my Thunderbird (52.6.) there are TWO buttons "Reply" and "List Reply" right next beside it. The right one sends to "cbm-hackers@musoftware.de" and the original "reply"-button to the author of the mail. Seems pretty straight-forward to me. tokraReceived on 2018-03-14 22:49:56
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.