On 03/13/2018 02:40 PM, Peter Bortas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:10 PM, <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-03-13, at 14:01, Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> wrote: >>> >>>>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/52.4.0/releasenotes/ >>>>> and it's called "improvement".... >>>> I can verify that going to Tools -> Alternatives -> Advanced -> Configuration editor and setting the variable mail.override_list_reply_to to false will fix this for cbm-hackers, likely also other mailing lists. >>>> How other email clients are doing this, and what should be desired behavior is beyond me, but as Thunderbird recently introduced this change must mean practises are about to change. >>> >>> Probably started by some (web-)Client that got it wrong but got popular and lots of people are now used to it and expect it everywhere. >>> >>> At least that's how it happens way too often. >> >> Yeah... I can't imagine how on Mother Earth _ignoring_ a fully established functional header can be done by default and called improvement. > > I can, and now I want this is my client. Reply-to munging on mailing > lists is considered harmful. Ignoring the Reply-To header if the mail > also has a list header sounds like the way of least harm. What do you mean 'least harm'? I prefer that a mailing list behaves like a normal email. Meaning when I reply to it, the reply goes to where it came from, the sender of the mail, or if from a mailing list, the mailing list. Very rarely I need a direct reply circumventing the list. GerritReceived on 2018-03-14 22:50:33
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.