> On 2018-03-15, at 09:48, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > >>> Your experiences and advice, please? TIA! >> >> Github is the Google of sources hosting today. This has it pros and cons but it is the "go to" choice. Bitbucket is well established and has somewhat better terms for individuals (free private repos for a good example). Preferred by those who don't like to "mix with the crowd". Gitlab is gaining some momentum but I _feel_ like it's somewhat lagging behind in terms of being the well established choice. And - as gpz pointed out - if you use sourceforge, everybody and their dog (including /me) will start to bash you for choosing the most badly sucking service to host your product. This is the free publicity, gpz wrote about :-)) > > And as long as you use git it doesn't matter much: even if the hosting > site goes down forever you can still migrate elsewhere without any > data loss, without much hassle even (except that you have to tell your > users about the move). Yeah, I forgot to add that as I felt it like being "obvious" but you are right. It might not be obvious for everyone. In general git is the choice these days, unless you are e. g. Google and have your own, customised VCS. -- SD!Received on 2018-03-15 11:01:35
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.