On 15/03/2018 09:27, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: > Yeah, I forgot to add that as I felt it like being "obvious" but you > are right. It might not be obvious for everyone. In general git is the > choice these days, unless you are e. g. Google and have your own, > customised VCS. The last time I looked github doesn't allow you to follow renames when looking at history on their web interface, it's also limited in terms of number of files it will show you in a directory. We've just sucked it up for the moment and haven't looked at switching, the others might suffer the same problem. The horrible git clients are IMO more of an issue. TortoiseGit on windows sucks pretty bad, but it's still the best graphical ui client I tried. Using a command line tool would take too much time out of my day. I'd still use git though, because having to remember how to use two horrible source control systems is too much hassle.Received on 2018-03-15 11:02:14
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.