Re: Discussion: The need of a 65xx HAL

From: smf <smf_at_null.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 13:24:52 +0100
Message-ID: <d6005b39-6f06-5e3d-b70a-aa4aa221b65f_at_null.net>
It's fine if you're shipping a single application for an embedded
product. But it's added complexity, for unspecified benefits. Why not
just use RISC-V?

On 04/09/2022 12:37, tokafondo_at_tokafondo.name wrote:
> In the world of FPGAs, I think this can be feasable. Instead of having
> CPU boards, having FPGA boards would allow to implement this way of
> using hardware.
Received on 2022-09-04 15:00:03

Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.